KEY DISTINCTIONS

 Multilateral (involving various countries)

Bilateral (German - Turkish trying to learn each others' language)

Classroom independent - Classroom Integrated - Institutionally Integrated 

QUESTIONS TO ASK

In what ways does online intercultural exchange contribute to the goals of foreign language learning in university education?

 Can and does participation in an online exchange foster the development of learner autonomy?

BOOKS TO READ

 Mehisto, P. Frigols M J, Marsh D (2008) Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual and multilingual education. London: Macmillan

MAIN BENEFITS

 ONLINE INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE PAGE 1

Promotes learner autonomy

Leads to intercultural communicative competence

contributes to second language learning

encourages the development of digital literacy

GÖZDEN GEÇİRELECEK ARAŞTIRMALAR

FRAMEWORK FOR CODING LEARNER INTERACTIONS

Varonis and Grass (1985) Nonnative / nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied linguistics, 6, 71-90

Frameworku kullanıp yapılan araştırmalar

Pelletierri (2000) Negotitation in cyperspace: The role of chatting in the development of communicative competence. In  M Warschauer and  R Kern (eds) Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice Cambridge University Press

Blake (2000) Computer mediate communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanugae

Smith(2003) Computer mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Moder language journal 87(1) 38-57

Smith(2004) Computer mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition

Smith B (2009) The relationship between scrolling, negotiation and self-initiated repair in an SCMC environment

Toyoda and Harrison (2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese

 Kitade (2006)  The negotiation model in asynchronous computer mediated communication. Negotiation in task based email exchnages

FRAMEWORK 2

Sociocultural theory lantolf&thorne

Language socialization 

Situated learning (gave and wenger)

Jin Erben (2007) In tercultural learnin via instant messenger interaction                

Darhower (2007) A tale of two communities: Group dynamics and community building in Spanish-English telecollaboration

FRAMEWORK 3

Jepson (2005) Conversations - and negotiated interaction - in text and voice chat rooms      

FRAMEWORK 4

Shekary and Tahririan (2006) Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat   

ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Berglund (2009) Multimodal student interaction online: An ecological perspective

Darhower (2008) The role of linguistic affordance  in telecollaborative chat

Johnson (2008) Postcards from the turbulent edge of chaos: Complexity theory and computer mediated communication.  In S Magnan (Ed) Mediating discouse onlne

ALAKASIZLAR

Reinh   rdt (2008) Negotiating meaningfulness: An enhanced perspective on interaction in computer mediated foreing language learning environments In S Magnan (Ed) Mediating discouse onlne

Pasfield-Neofiotu.S (2011) Second language learners' experiences of virtual community and foreignness. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2), 92-108 Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2011/pasfieldneofitou.pdf

 Belz 2003 Linguistic perspectives on the development of  intercultural competence in telecollaboration Language learning and technology  7, 2, 68-99